{"id":38,"date":"2021-01-11T17:46:40","date_gmt":"2021-01-11T17:46:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dcfeedback.com\/whj\/?p=38"},"modified":"2021-01-11T17:48:23","modified_gmt":"2021-01-11T17:48:23","slug":"unmasking-dcs-affordable-housing-policy-i","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/dcfeedback.com\/whj\/2021\/01\/11\/unmasking-dcs-affordable-housing-policy-i\/","title":{"rendered":"UnMasking DC&#8217;s Affordable Housing Policy I"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><font face=\"arial\" size=\"2\"><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">A major element of today&#8217;s DC Affordable Housing policies and implementations are based on a flawed and even corrupt model incubated years ago in Ward 1.&nbsp; &nbsp;This model is the basis of most development deals past and present emanating out of DMPED, Inclusionary Zoning (IZ) and the current Comp Plan Bill&nbsp;B23-0736.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">In approximately 2001, DC adopted an affordable housing development model based on the write-down of the value of public land contributed to private&nbsp;development deals.&nbsp; The model proffered that the value of the contributed public land would pay for the production of affordable housing;&nbsp;therefore, the city would not have to investment public dollars in the creation of affordable housing.&nbsp; Instead the market would pay for the development of affordable housing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">The first test of this model was the awarding of two publicly owned&nbsp; 14th Street Columbia Heights urban renewal parcels to developer <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bizjournals.com\/washington\/stories\/2002\/02\/25\/newscolumn4.html\">Donatelli&nbsp;&amp; Kline, today Donatelli Development<\/a>.&nbsp; The parcels today host the Kenyon Square and Highland Park I and II developments.&nbsp; Donatelli&#8217;s proposal was accepted by the city based on this write-down premised in his proposal including the fact that <strong>&#8220;NO&#8221;<\/strong> additional city money or resources would be required to achieve affordable housing and other public\/community benefit goals with these projects.&nbsp; In fact Donatelli &amp; Klein went further saying they still pay for the public land.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">At the time of the Donatelli&nbsp;&amp; Klein award other developers and professionals warned that Donatelli&#8217;s proposal was not viable, but the award was made.&nbsp; &nbsp;And the city passed legislation making Donatelli&#8217;s proffer city law, public land value write-down would pay for 20% affordable housing with no additional public investment.&nbsp; &nbsp; The only exception from Donatelli&#8217;s proposal was the use of federal low income housing tax credits, LIHTCs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">By 2004, Donatelli was already hedging on their proposal and by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bizjournals.com\/washington\/blog\/breaking_ground\/2009\/12\/the_tax_abatement_trickle.html\">2009 would request a bailout of a property tax abatement valued at $8.5M<\/a>.&nbsp; &nbsp;They would also stall for time, ask for additional zoning relief, <a href=\"https:\/\/dcauditor.org\/report\/audit-of-the-affordable-housing-mandates-for-development-projects-formerly-managed-by-the-dissolved-national-capital-revitalization-corporation-and-anacostia-waterfront-corporation\/\">cheat the affordable housing requirements<\/a>&nbsp;(per DC Auditor), reduce ADU unit size,&nbsp;steal public land and homelessness resources.&nbsp; &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bizjournals.com\/washington\/stories\/2010\/06\/14\/story7.html\">The Donatelli model collapsed in failure<\/a>. Yet today, this model remains the hart and soul of DC housing policy including the New Communities Initiative (NCI), and OP&#8217;s Comp Plan amendments currently before the City Council.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">Behind the mask of growth&nbsp;and density which is the current front for DC Affordable Housing policy is a reality that underlying policy never worked from the beginning.&nbsp; Starting in Ward&nbsp;1&nbsp;Columbia Heights in 2001 thru today in Ward 1&#8217;s Park Morton New Communities Initiative project today on Georgia Avenue.&nbsp; &nbsp;In 2021 its time to strip away&nbsp;DC&#8217;s affordable housing mask and reveal a displacement model of greed and discrimination under cover of smart growth.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">William<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/dcfeedback.com\/whj\/\">http:\/\/dcfeedback.com\/whj\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;padding:0;font-family: arial; font-size: 14pt; overflow-wrap: break-word;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; A major element of today&#8217;s DC Affordable Housing policies and implementations are based on a flawed and even corrupt model incubated years ago in Ward 1.&nbsp; &nbsp;This model is the basis of most development deals past and present emanating out of DMPED, Inclusionary Zoning (IZ) and the current Comp Plan Bill&nbsp;B23-0736.&nbsp; &nbsp; In approximately &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-thoughts"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/dcfeedback.com\/whj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/dcfeedback.com\/whj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/dcfeedback.com\/whj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dcfeedback.com\/whj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dcfeedback.com\/whj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/dcfeedback.com\/whj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/dcfeedback.com\/whj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dcfeedback.com\/whj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/dcfeedback.com\/whj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}